A Perfect, (and Indeed Scurrilous), Storm - Part VII, VIII & IX
Part IX - Cry Baby Matthews
February 5, 2009
Well, it appears that whiney Judge Mathews and his family and a couple of the lawyers and their families feel threatened by my website and by the stories I am writing and by blogs on this post. Blogs are the comments ya’ll make and which I frequently respond to.
I was in the shower today, when I heard all hell breaking loose, with someone trying to pound down my door. I was frightened, thinking Judge Matthews had issued a bench warrant for my arrest which I was not aware of, and so I stayed put until I could not hear anymore.
When I got out of the shower, I went to get my phone to call the bondsman I had made arrangements with yesterday, to alert him. I discovered a friend of mine in law enforcement had called. He was at home, sick, but was trying to get in touch with me for FBI Special Agent Bob Meadows.
It turns out that it was Bob Meadows and another law enforcement individual at my door banging.
My friend told me to call them which I did, and they asked me to come down the “Station”, which I did.
Apparently, as I said in my first paragraph, Judge Matthews and the “attorneys” have taken exception to what I have been writing, and were intimidated and afraid for their lives.
I know that SA Meadows had to call me in, because a judge was raising an issue, and the FBI have to check stuff out just in case. But I was furious, and so I began asking Agent Meadows if he knew how afraid I had been in this last year. Take a good look Judge Walter Mathews and Jack Harris, and see if you think I have any reason to have been afraid and intimidated over this last year. See if any of these things, Walter Matthews, which are documented in the Motion for Protective Order which you so glibly denied last September would scare you or your families. I don’t remember any FBI Agent running to knock on anyone’s door about the vicious threats and direct intimidation of me. Let’s take a look, Cheryl Matthews and other wives and family members, to see if your husbands have had a hand in encouraging and approving of SERIOUS threats and intimidation of me:
1. Georgia Florida Game, 2007
Let’s start with the weekend of the 2007 Georgia-Florida game, immediately prior to the series launch on the Chattooga County Dixie Mafia, when my son, whom you taught Cheryl, came home to watch the game and to attend an event held at the Canyon Ridge Golf Course, where a couple of readers of RomeNewsByWatson.com wanted to introduce me to Governor Sonny Perdue. Perdue had become aware of my website because of Newt Gingrich.
That Saturday morning, as we left home to go run to Kroger, we noticed a newspaper placed at the basement door where we exit to go to the cars. It was a copy of the Summerville News, a local Chattooga County newspaper in Bobby Lee Cook’s hometown. When I tried to lock my door, there was something jammed inside.
I called RPD Assistant Chief Lonzo Roberson, who dispatched a Detective, who determined that a lock pick had been jammed inside the lock. According to the Detective, it did not appear that someone was trying to actually break in, but that the lock pick had been intentionally broken off.
I got the message.
On November 7, at Nov 7, 12:42 PM, a poster, (steadfast | firstname.lastname@example.org | IP: 22.214.171.124) , wrote a very lengthy and involved, and very vicious e-mail to me to which I responded late that evening.
In this post, he used phrases favored by Bobby Lee Cook:
a) “There is evidence I offer you here in a court order by Judge Connelly finding your bed mate to be a fraud and a perjurer.b) “-a dog chasing his tail and now a bitch to run in his pack!!”
Once again, as is Bobby Lee Cook’s style when he is challenged by a woman, he wrote insinuating sexual impropriety:
3) “You attended the Mullis republican affair with one disgruntled summerville lawyer William “Ben” Ballenger”.
NOTE: As I have already said, I attended the affair with my son, at the invitation of a friend of Governor Perdue’s, because Newt Gingrich and Governor Perdue were becoming aware of the website, Gingrich was actually advertising on the site, and putting a link to it from his American Solutions website, after Featuring one of my op-eds on his site. (“The Second American Revolution”).
But with Steadfast’s second post, this time, I was at home and on the website when the post came over, and I responded almost immediately, this time letting “Steadfast” know who I thought he was. A few minutes after my response, my Un-listed home, land line phone rang, and the answering machine picked up before I could catch it.
Two semi-automatic gun shots rang across the phone line.
I called 911, and an RPD Officer was dispatched, who was incredulous, and kept playing the recording over and over, calling various people to have them listen. His report was turned over to RPD Detective Pete Sailors, who pulled phone logs from my phone carrier, and traced the calls, which lead to a phone by an old woman who lives in the High Rise Government Subsidized apartments on North Fifth Avenue. Sailors interviewed the woman, and she admitted that she allowed various neighbors to use her phone.
Several weeks later, a reader contacted me and told me that they had seen a former law enforcement Officer Kilgo, sitting at lunch with Bobby Lee Cook, and Ron Patton at the Partridge Restaurant on Broad Street, the Wednesday before Thanksgiving. They were having a heated argument, and Ron Patton stormed out.
As it turns out, this same Kilgo left the Floyd County Department years ago, after a scandal was uncovered revealing that Kilgo was involved with a federally convicted pipe bomb maker. In fact, Kilgo himself was seriously injured when a pipe bomb went off. This very same Kilgo was, last year, listed as one of the North Fifth Avenue High Rise tenants. Detective Pete Sailors followed it as far as possible, but assumed the gun shots were fired from a remote cell phone held to the old lady’s home phone at the high rise.
This was just the beginning of the intimidation of me and my website, by Bobby Lee Cook and his associates, whom your husband, Cheryl, is protecting and covering for, in a case where the Plaintiff was not really a Plaintiff.
When I came out with a strong op-ed after the gun shots were fired, Cook and Crew began intimidation through Abusive Litigation.
3. Galloway v Jones Case
a) Bobby Lee Cook also forced me, through a Motion to Compel, to testify in one of his civil cases where I did not know the litigants and which had been filed about Six Months prior to my even starting this website. For four hours, Bobby Lee Cook did not once ask a question about that case, (of which I knew nothing about), but attempted to try to force me to reveal my sources and answer humiliating questions about my past, from 25 years ago and more. This occurred at the second round of deposition. I and my son walked out of the first deposition when Bobby Lee Cook began calling her vulgar names, “Miss Nipples” and “God Damn Bitch”. (Exhibit 12, Below).
Think you’d be intimidated? Yet this is what your husbands have been aware of, had documentation on, and have still supported and allowed.
b) Now, Bobby Lee, in part with the help of your husbands, has brought cases against me, for which I am protected by Federal Law. Cheryl, your husband illegally tried to manipulate the situation as far back as June of last year, because he knew the cases could go no where, and because Bobby Lee Cook was exposed at that time to significant damages through Abusive Litigation.
We learned this fall that Stephanie Dennis, the Plaintiff in the case before Judge Matthews, was not a true Plaintiff, and we have an affidavit by someone who is highly respected in several counties to attest to that. But Cheryl, I guess those Country Club dues are stiff, and your husband had to be sure the dues got paid, both at the CCC and to Bobby Lee Cook for protecting his nasty, dirty little secrets, which outside of the Country Club are not so secret.
So, instead of allowing my witnesses to testify, good old WALT and Bobby Lee came up with a plan to remove my attorney from my case. It is illegal what he did, and that whole issue is before the Supreme Court of Georgia right now, which makes all of his pathetic little rulings in the last month so laughable.
Non-silk-stocking attorneys tell me frequently about how often Walt has changed signed Rule Nisis in the file, after copies of what was originally written and mailed, or, as in my case has made Signed Rule Nisi’s disappear. Then there are the long rambling disjointed explanations and circular reasoning he attempts to justify a ruling when the fix is in.
But this time, your husband has made public documents disappear, namely the log book which proves that he lied on the record in court. We just got a letter back from the Council of Superior Court Judges, to whom we had submitted a Georgia Open Records Request, and they had to admit that the records we seek, “No longer exist”.
Now tell me, why would a judge refuse to turn over evidence which are public records, and then actually make them disappear? Think he is hiding evidence of a CRIME?
Think you would be intimidated if everywhere you turned for help and answers, the wagons were circled?
We will be updating AG Thurbert Baker here shortly, about that turn of events.
But, I digress.
Back to the litigation BLC filed against me. Dennis is not a true Plaintiff, and the Hammitts, as it turns out, really were growing, using and trafficking in marijuana. We got the proof. Heck, I wonder if that family is frightened by this website. (Exhibit 20- Below).
But even if no proof had come available, the United States Code is very clear. Neither a website not its owners are responsible for what some BLOGGER posts.
I am not responsible and over and over in pleadings we made that clear, but your husband, Cheryl, is too ignorant and too arrogant to figure that out, and certainly too corrupt to care. There is no way he could have EVER read our answer to the law suit, or the Motion to Dismiss, or any other countless responsive pleadings throughout this last year, without knowing this case should NEVER have been brought.
4. Conspiracy to Violate Interstate Commerce
In late December, 2007 and early January, 2008, Bobby Lee Cook began calling and/or sending formal letters threatening my advertisers that they would be added to the law suits as “Co-conspirators” should they continue to advertise on the website. (Exhibit 10, Below).
My website now has NO ad revenues coming in, effectively gutting my operation and causing serious, long term financial hardships for me and my family. What if your husband’s salary which I and my readers help to pay through our taxes, was suddenly not there? Would you feel threatened then, Cheryl?
Not the final, but certainly one of the most disturbing, THREATENING and fear inducing events, was having this letter, (Exhibit 9, Below), delivered by Overnight Express Mail on Christmas Eve, after I had spent over a month struggling in pain.
Now, you feel intimidated? Your little book club, bridge playing worlds are probably all a-twitter with the excitement of how this must be so traumatic for you. But really, tell your husbands to grow some, and stop destroying evidence and hiding behind the skirts of the CSCJ - tell them to stop protecting members of the Dixie Mafia.
And by the way, if your husbands are going to be dancing with the devil, you had better get used to feeling threatened, but not from this side of the fence. In fact, it is that fear and intimidation imposed on good old Walt which has resulted in all of his rulings in this Dennis case over the last year.
You have nothing to fear from me, but the truth, and I will continue to expose it, regardless of how frightened you feel or how embarrassed you become.
Part VIII - The Definition of a “Directed Verdict”
February 4, 2009
Today, despite the fact that my case, Dennis v Watson et al, is in the Breast of the Supreme Court of Georgia, meaning Judge Matthews can not legally rule on any aspect of the case, Judge Matthews indeed held a hearing, and issued a Directed Verdict AGAINST me, the Defendant.
My friend, John Bailey of the Rome News Tribune called me this evening, as he ordering in the Starbuck’s drive through. “I’m gonna need a lot of coffee tonight for this one”.
He had called to find out what happened this morning in the hearing which Judge Walter Matthews order, illegally.
He told me that he had been called by the newsroom, because the Summerville News’ website was reporting that Judge Matthews had issued a Directed Verdict AGAINST me and my website, for comments posted by someone else, NOT ME, and which are protected by United States Code, 47USC230.
What makes this case even more bizarre is that the alleged Plaintiff, Stephanie Dennis, contacted several people in October to tell them that she had never authorized the case against me. One of those individuals took a great step of faith and courage to tell his story in an affidavit, and sign it. That affidavit is in several court pleadings now, and Judge Matthews has seen them.
That man was also present at the hearing on December 17, 2009, to testify to such, when Judge Matthews illegally removed my attorney from the case, which is the very act which allowed us the right to a Direct Appeal to the Supreme Court.
But today, despite the law, despite the facts of the case, despite the authority of the United States Code and the Supreme Court of Georgia, our Floyd County Superior Court Judge Walter J. Matthews issued a Directed Verdict against me and my website, the two defendants in this case, WHILE IT IS STILL pending in the Supreme Court.
This, I might add, is the same judge who, in the aftermath of his Marcus Dixon sentencing, was labeled the “Chief Judge of Hicksville, Georgia”, by the L.A. Times, for his obvious grasp of reality and his ignorance of the law.
Definition of Directed Verdict:
Definitions of directed verdict on the Web:
wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn In law, a directed verdict is ruling by a judge presiding over a jury trial typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directed_verdict At the close of a plaintiffs case, a defendant asks the court to rule that the plaintiff has failed to put forth sufficient evidence, even when …
www.id.uscourts.gov/terms-cd.htmAfter evidence has been presented and if no issue of fact remains for the jury to determine, the judge will tell the jury what verdict to return. The jury must return that verdict.
A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff’s favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgment of acquittal for the defendant.
Do you see a pattern here? Always in a JURY trial, and usually for the Defendant, because the Plaintiff does not have enough evidence to have brought the case.
What must Bobby Lee Cook have on Judge Walter J. Matthews to get him to kamikaze into the battleship USS Justice?For the whole story, see the story below, and also read Parts 1-6 o this series, in
January 4, 2009 -A Perfect (and Indeed, Scurrilous) Storm: Parts I, II & III and January 13, 2009 - A Perfect, (and Indeed, Scurrilous), Storm: Part IV, V & VI ).
Part VII - MEANWHILE, Back at the Ranch
(NOTE: For a full list of all of the Exhibits related to this multi-part story, please scroll down to the bottom of this installment)
February 2, 2009
It has long been understood that whenever a party files a Notice of Appeal to the Supreme Court of Georgia, that an automatic Supersedeas or a Stay in all proceedings is in place.
This is case of “Direct Appeal”.
You see, O.C.G.A. 5-6-34 identifies “Contempt” during the proceedings of court, as a right of Direct Appeal to the Supreme Court, and case law over the years has clarified that even when the word “Contempt” is not used, that forcible removal of an attorney from a case by a Superior Court Judge, as Judge Matthews did during our December 17, 2008 hearing, is a case of criminal contempt which is directly appealable to the Supreme Court. (See 264 Ga. 641; IN RE AUGUST F. SIEMON III.; 449 SE2d 832 and 253 Ga. 789; GARLAND v. STATE; 325 SE2d 131).
Furthermore, a Superior Court Judge can only punish for contempt, according to O.C.G.A 15-6-8, by fining up to $500.00, or incarcerating someone. NOT REMOVING an attorney from a case:
TITLE 15. COURTS
CHAPTER 6. SUPERIOR COURTS
ARTICLE 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS
O.C.G.A. 15-6-8 (2008)
15-6-8. Jurisdiction and powers of superior courts
The superior courts have authority:
(5) To punish contempt by fines not exceeding $500.00 and by imprisonment not exceeding 20 days; and
Superior Court Judges DO NOT have the authority to remove an attorney from a case, unless a request by the client to do so has been filed with the court.
SO, on January 16, 2009, we filed a Notice of Appeal in the Floyd County Superior Court, asking that all the files be transferred to the Supreme Court. Our new Clerk of Floyd County Court, Barbara Pinson, did as requested, and the Supreme Court having received the file and reviewed the elements, accepted the case and docketed it on January 21, 2009, assigning a Supreme Court Case number of S09M0738.
End of discussion.
Additionally, however, even prior to filing our Notice of Appeal, I had also filed a Motion to Disqualify and Affidavit in Support of, filing it within the 5-day period after Judge Matthews’ December 17, 2008 removal of my attorney, displaying an illegal and unethical bias toward Bobby Lee Cook and prejudice against my attorney and myself. I also cited relative Georgia Code, Georgia Judicial Cannons of Ethics and the United States Constitution, (relative to Civil Due Process), which all require that Judge Matthews remove himself from my case.
Now, for those who do not know, whenever a party files a Motion to Disqualify, the judge is BARRED from ruling on any other issue on the case until he resolves the Disqualification, and in most cases, is required to remove himself.
Finally, just in case Judge Matthews did not “get it” we also filed, on January 21, 2009, a formal Motion to Stay with the Supreme Court of Georgia.
Now, watch the time line which follows, and read some of Judge Matthews’ illegal rulings:
December 23, 2007 - Four Business days after Judge Matthews removed my attorney from my case, and within the required 5-Business day rule, I filed the Motion to Disqualify Judge Matthews, pro se, and Affidavit in Support Of as Judge Matthews order barred my attorney from filing anything with the Clerk of Court, (an illegal act by Judge Matthews).
January 16, 2009 - On the 30th day after the removal, I filed a Notice of Appeal to the Supreme Court of Georgia, Pro se, again, as such “Notices” must be filed in the court of origin, and my attorney had been barred, (illegally), from filing anything with the Floyd County Clerk of Court. (Exhibit 21).
January 21, 2009 - We filed a formal Motion to Stay the Issues with the Georgia Supreme Court (Exhibit 22).
January 21, 2009 - Our case was formally docketed at the Georgia Supreme Court, and assigned a number - S09M0738.
Automatic Stay is in place, now, RIGHT?
January 21, 2009 - Despite the pending Motion to Disqualify AND the Filed Notice of Appeal, Judge Matthews was STILL issuing orders in the case. (Exhibit 23).
But Note this order per Clerk of Court’s mailing certificate, was filed less than one hour after Plaintiff’s attorney, Bobby Lee Cook, received his certified mail copy of the Notice of Appeal, (Exhibit 24- copy of USPS printout and Signed green card enclosed).
January 26, 2009 - Now, I got the January 21, 2009 order from Judge Matthews on Saturday, January 24, 2009. So, on Monday morning, I called Judge Matthews’ secretary, Jeanne Roberts, and informed her that Judge Matthews had issued an order, the previous week, and ordered me to appear in court the next morning despite the pending Motion to Disqualify, and despite the Notice of Appeal, and despite the fact that I was a witness in criminal case in Walker County the next morning, legally conflicting with Judge Matthews’ order.
I also, assuming they may not know yet, informed her that on the same day Judge Matthews issued his order, we had further protected me by filing a formal Motion to Stay with the Supreme Court.
Ms. Roberts instructed me to call back later that day, after she had a chance to speak with Judge Matthews. When I called, shortly before 5:00 PM, no one answered.
January 27, 2009 - I called Judge Matthews’ secretary back on my way to the Walker County Criminal trial, in which I had to produce Certified Documents, and testify about the Chain of Custody of such. Ms. Roberts told me that Judge Matthews still expected me to be in his court room that morning despite EVERYTHING legal which allowed me not to appear, including that testimony in a criminal trial takes precedence over ALL other court obligations, including hearings in federal court which are not related to a criminal issue.
BUT, it gets better.
Judge Matthews indeed held the hearing without me on Tuesday, January 27, 2009, and sanctioned me severely.
But before he did so, Judge Matthews did something I have NEVER heard of a Judge doing. That morning, Floyd County Superior Judge Matthews called the Walker County Courthouse, and demanded that the criminal trial of Sherry DeRoche be interrupted, so that he could determine if I was indeed a witness. Lookout Mountain Judicial Circuit Senior Judge Jon Bo Wood then had to dismiss the jurors at that time to allow Ms. DeRoche’s attorney to speak to Judge Matthews to confirm that I was a witness testifying about the Chain of Custody for evidence in the form of Certified Public Documents which I had researched and retrieved the previous day from the Federal courthouse in Rome, Georgia.
Yet despite his untoward intrusion into another county’s criminal trial, and despite the fact that this case had already been docketed with, and a Motion for Stay filed with the Supreme Court of Georgia, Judge Matthews issued yet a third set of orders late that Tuesday afternoon.
1) In the first of these three orders issued that Tuesday, Judge Matthews writes that “The Defendant was absent from court without leave of Court and did not appear at the hearing”. (Exhibit 25a), despite the Subpoena (Exhibit 25b).
Judge Matthews then ordered me to pay to the Plaintiff , Stephanie Dennis, a sum of $2,500.00 by Tuesday, February 3, 2009, DESPITE the fact, that Judge Matthews knew by the pending Motion to Disqualify and by the Notice of Appeal, that this whole case was brought fraudulently by Bobby Lee Cook and Rex Abernathy WITHOUT Plaintiff’s consent.
He further ordered me to appear at court on Wednesday, February 4, 2009 at 9:00 AM, if I FAILED to pay the $2,500.00. I DID NOT PAY the $2,500.00. I guess Judge Matthews he thinks he will throw me in jail on Wednesday morning, but his restrictions on jailing me over non payment of his order, WITHOUT a jury trial is also prohibited by the Georgia Code:
TITLE 15. COURTS
CHAPTER 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS
O.C.G.A. 15-1-4 (2008)
15-1-4. Extent of contempt power; when jury trial required; bond; appeal; violation of alimony or child support order
(b) No person shall be imprisoned for contempt for failing or refusing to pay over money under any order, decree, or judgment of any court of law or any other court of this state when he denies that the money ordered or decreed to be paid over is in his power, custody, or control until he has a trial by jury in accordance with the following provisions…
2) In the second order, Judge Matthews, who does not have the authority to do so,
actually presumed the powers of the Justices of the Supreme Court, and “Dismissed” our Notice of Appeal, on the grounds that it was “void as without any basis in law”.
This despite that it was filed, in part on O.C.G.A. 5-6-34 a (1) , O.C.G.A. 5-6-34 (d), O.C.G.A. 5-6-13 , O.C.G.A. 9-15-14 and O.C.G.A. 9-11-62, BUT MORE importantly that the power to deny a Notice of Appeal is not vested in Superior Courts, but only in the power of the Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court had ALREADY accepted and docketed the case. (Exhibit 26)
Did Judge Matthews get his law degree off the back of a Cracker Jack Box?
3) Judge Matthews issued an Order on my Motion to Disqualify finding it was “NOT timely” nor “legally sufficient”, although it was filed before the five day deadline and cited Georgia law and United States Constitutional law relative to civil Due Process, as well as requirements of the Georgia Judicial Cannons of Ethics for Disqualification. (Also Exhibit 26).
IS Bobby Lee Cook Backtracking, Now?
A couple of final observation. On Tuesday afternoon, January 27, 2009, at 3:48 PM according to the USPS Overnight Envelope, and just minutes prior to the postal meter date and time of Judge Matthews’ three bizarre Orders, at 3:50pm, Bobby Lee Cook posted an overnight letter to me, telling me that “at the suggestion of the court” he was cancelling and withdrawing his Notice of Deposition of me, which was supposed to have taken place on Thursday, January 29, 2009.
I have no idea why he would be back tracking now, after Judge Matthews stuck his neck out for Bobby Lee Cook all of these last many months.
Continuing Criminal Enterprise & RICO:
In both federal and state law, one can find the terms CCE, (Continuing Criminal Enterprise), and RICO, ( Racketeering and Influenced Corrupt Organizations).
CCE’s are exactly what they sound like, organized enterprises to make money, which just happen to be making money by breaking laws. Mario Armas was found to be the head of a CCE which trafficked in marijuana and also laundered the illegal profits.
In RICO, CCE’s actually use intimidation, extortion, influence and bribery to get their work done.
Now, in both CCE and RICO, conspiracy is a primary element, and as few as two people can be part of a conspiracy. In RICO it takes two or more people, conspiring to commit at least two related crimes. It is NOT necessary to prove that an individual has participated in the entire breadth of a enterprise’s various activities. An individual co-conspirator need only to have willingly participated in one single overt act to be part of the over-arching conspiracy.
We already know, from Part VI of this series, that the Hammitts, who have also sued me and this website, are/were engaged in the cultivation, use and trafficking of, (to a Trion City Councilman), marijuana.
Let me assure my readers that this is now being investigated. The Trion Councilman has also been identified.
Those are several of the crimes in this particular CCE.
Bobby Lee Cook, Rex Abernathy and Jon Dennis have participated in conspiring to bring litigation against me and my website to intimidate me, FREE SPEECH and a FREE PRESS, while protecting the drug trafficking Hammits, and so those are another set of crimes in this CCE’s conspiracy, and because these crimes involve intimidation, and because there are two specific law suits, this is a RICO CCE.
So, a Superior Court Judge who happens to violate the law, and lies about documents he has signed, and refuses to turn over the evidence which proves he has lied, but which has been witnessed be several people - a Superior Court Judge who learns and does nothing about the fact that a “Plaintiff” in a case before him is not even a Plaintiff , all in order to PROTECT, Cover up the crimes of , and to help Perpetuate the CCE and its various activities, has engaged himself as a willing participant in a State and/or Federal RICO CCE Conspiracy.
In this particular RICO CCE, Judge Matthews has become involved in, and is a member of an organization which grows, uses and traffics in marijuana, files false and fraudulent litigation, intimidates advertisers, thus violating free trade laws, and which intimidates those who would practice Free Speech, and those who are members of a Free Press, the last two of which are serious violations of the United States Constitution’s First Amendment.
I hope that Floyd County Superior Court Judge Walter J. Matthews has a good criminal attorney.
(NOTE: The following exhibits are provided for enhancing your understanding of this detailed and complicated story).
Exhibit 1 - Original Dennis v Watson Complaint .Exhibit 2 - December 12, 2007 Retraction Article & Proof of Removal of Post?.Exhibit 3 -
Matthews’ September 26, 2008 Order re: September 23, 2008 Hearing .Exhibit 5b - Ex-Parte Communication Not Afforded Defense? Exhibit 6a -
Matthews’ December 17, 2008 Removing Attorney Anderson From Case.Exhibit 8 - BLC’s Letter Threatening My Attorney .Exhibit 9 -
Other Examples of BLC-Related Documents Using the Word Scurrilous.Exhibit 14 - 30-Day Abusive Litigation Demand Letter to Jack Harris & Partners of McRae, Stegall, Peek, Harman, Smith & Manning .Exhibit 15 -
Hammitt - Proof of Removal with BLC’s Exhibit, then Our Proof.Exhibit 18 - Hammitt - December 5, 2007 Retraction Article .Exhibit 19 -
Judge Matthews January 27, 2009 Order to Me to Pay Plaintiff $2,500, Because I Did Not Have Leave of Court.Exhibit 25b - Copy of Subpoena I Recovered from My Trash, AFTER I Received Judge Matthews’ Order That I Had No Leave of Court.Exhibit 26 -
Judge Matthews’ January 27, 2009 Orders, 1) Denying Motion to Disqualify and 2) Denying Notice of Appeal. Exhibit 27 - BLC’s Letter Withdrawing Notice to Depose Me for January 29, 2009. (Dated January 27, 2008 - wrong year).