This story has stirred the pot. I was wondering if you have ever run across Mr. House’s name in any of your investigations?

I have also read of some possible good news for Mrs. Lemming. Will you be covering her story again?

Dear Room4,

There is a slim chance for Ms. Lemming. I was at the hearing on Friday, and will plan to do a story in a couple of days. It was my fist chance to see our one year old Floyd County Superior Court Judge in action, Jack Niedrach, ELECTED not Appointed to the bench his first go-around, and I was so impressed with his thoroughness, considering every angle, balanced by his compassion and respect shown to Ms. Lemming and her whole family.

He has ordered the attorney for Ms. Lemming, Floyd Farless, for some case law on an item I had not ever even considered, which Mr. Farless, who just came into the case in the last week, raised. That is the slim chance Ms. Lemming has.

Mr. Farless has to get the Motion to Judge Niedrach by this Wednesday, then KayAnne Weatherington, the ADA, has until the next Wednesday to respond, (They are fighting tooth and toenail against any consideration), and then Judge Niedrach will consider all points and make a decision.

She even told Jack Niedrach that he did not have jurisdiction in the matter, and Judge Niedrach politely, but firmly told her he had read the transcript, but was open to options - this issue raised by Floyd Farless being one.

One of Ms. Lemming’s daughters had filed a Motion for Reconsideration in November, after Ms. Lemming had written her sentencing judge a letter asking for her to reconsider her sentence. A sentencing judge has the authority to do that, AFTER the fact, but Judge Coslton wrote Lemming a letter saying that because she had recused herself, she had no more jurisdiction.

Of course, Colston should have, by law, recused herself PRIOR to sentencing Ms. Lemming.

But in the letter from Judge Colston, Colston suggested to Ms. Lemming that she file a Motion for Reconsideration, KNOWING FULL WELL THAT THE TIME LIMIT FOR DOING SO had long since passed. It was almost as if Colston was a cat playing with a mouse before she kills it. That was simply cruel.

But, in the interim, Floyd Farless, whom a detective friend of mine say knows more law than most, found something else to hang a hat on, and so, perhaps…

But Judge the was very open and honest with Ms. Lemming, and made it clear that except for this one point of law Mr. Farless has raised, his hands appear to be tied. He told the court that as Mr. Farless had pointed out, this sentence was indeed HARSH, but legal.

Jack Niedrach is a jurist Floyd County can be proud of.

I am in the middle of family arrangements for a major situation, right now, and this as well as my Chattooga County Land Grab story will have to wait until mid-week. In fact, I may wait until after the Judge makes a decision to post the whole Lemming story.

As for Mr. House, I had not heard of him before, and I am not sure I have ever encountered him before.

I do not know a whole lot about him or the situation.

tw

It’s no secret around town that Larry is a skirt chaser. He’s been that way for years. It’s sad that Lorraine is paying the price for Larry and Colston’s infidelity. Colston has misused her position as a form of personal revenge and charges should be brought up against her for it.

Dear NR,

I cannot say Mr. Lemming is a skirt chaser, or even confirm that he has that reputation. I know this town is big on gossip and innuendo.

In fact, he has never confirmed or denied the relationship with Colston. Lemming’s daughters knew about it, though, and made no secret about it, even in a public meeting last year, at the Georgia Commission on Women.

What I do know about Mr. Lemming is that he has ALWAYS been more than a gentleman in my presence, and my husband and I have been out with him and to his home to meet his family and dine. My husband and Mr. Lemming both love history, and both love Antiques Road Show.

We even took him out for his birthday, recently, along with the P.I. who does not exist, (according to RGS), and his wife.

tw

Your quote - “It’s not what you know, or what you did, but who you know , or in Lorraine’s case, who her ex-husband slept with and then walked away from…Colston. Hell hath no fury like a woman (judge) scornded.”

I’ll leave you to your own gossiping but I expect you to hold my identity private.

Dear Nosey,

This website belongs to me, not to anyone else.

For two years I fought law suits for what other people posted. I FOUGHT. I paid the bills. I trust and vet what I post, and while sometimes I make mistakes, I am willing and will be able to answer for my mistakes. I cannot answer and am not willing to answer for yours or anyone else’s mistakes or gossip.

You are a business person. Can you imagine someone coming to you and trying to run one of the aspects of your business, or try to trash it? Can you imagine when they are given a hint, that they come back and criticize and give ultimatums, or try to set rules for you? That is NOT how a business works.

People do not get to come into your business or mine, and set the rules. They may be accommodated or catered to, but they do not run the place.

Now, I have never revealed the identity of anyone, yet, in two years. The only people who have been discovered are those who have gone out into the community and bragged about who they are on this website. IN fact, that is exactly how Kenneth Busbin got sued. Even when I was sued for something, yet another poster had written, in the Dennis case, no one found out who that user was. Because they were careful and never ran their mouth, BLC was never able to learn from anyone INCLUDING me, through two years of brutal legal abuse, THAT I PAID FOR AND WORKED MY BUTT OFF ON, who that poster was.

So DO NOT DARE lecture me or give me an ultimatum. The federal code says that I MAY reveal if I want to, but that I do not have to. I choose not to, and have more than paid the sacrifice for doing so. I have had to “Unapprove” a number of things you have posted through the last year or so, because you said horrible things about other posters, or gossiped about innocent people.

From now on, please respect the fact that this is not a Socialist Society, nor a communal website. My name is on it, I borrowed the money to build the website, and I continue to pay the bills, so I make the rules, since I take the risks.

You are more than welcome NOT to post here again.

tw

TW, I guess my blog just wasn’t meant to be posted. In the mean time your last response to RoseyNosey took care of part it. The last thing you need is to end up with another fruitless lawsuit against you.

The other thing was about Lorraine Lemming. I do not know this lady, but I continue to pray for her. I cannot seem to comprehend how a judge who should have recused themselves, was able to pass down such a harsh sentence and our judicial system allowed it. My question; is there a chance that Governor Perdue could pardon or commute her sentence, since this is his last year?

Still a loyal reader to your site, who still supports you in your fight against corruption.

Dear SAK,

The State Legislature took away the Governor’s right to pardon/commute sentences a few years back. There was a Sentence Review Panel, which Ms. Lemming had applied to in the statutory time period, but then that Board was declared unconstitutional. However, all sentences for which a request to review had already been applied to, where all still supposed to be considered. Lorraine’s was not, and that is one of the key issues Floyd Farless will be addressing when he submits his Pleading for Judge Niedrach.

I am sure that Mr. Lemming and his family are much encouraged by thoughtful concerns and prayers of people like you.

tw